![]() Writing the GUI part to go along with a new feature generally takes at least ten times as long as adding the feature. In general changing workflow often means rewriting the GUI. Changes to the workflow that Ardour has chosen are therefore more likely to be because there was a problem with the protools workflow.Īll that aside, all of Ardour’s keyboard shortcuts can be set to match whatever DAW the user desires if they have muscle memory that would benefit from that. A bit of history… the tale I heard was that protools did not have a linux version and so Ardour was started as a linux version of protools… as such Ardour actually has a workflow more similar to protools than garageband for example. In both cases A and B above the learning curve is no different learning protools or Ardour. In all cases of using any DAW (including protools) there is a learning curve. That being the case, they are more likely looking for a reaper clone than a protools clone. Rather Ardour will be used by those who are A) convinced that open source with Linux as an OS is the only way to go or B) looking for something they can afford because they could never afford protools even if they wanted to or C) They have heard really good reviews of Ardour somewhere (or MixBus). ![]() ![]() Those who have already paid for Protools, are unlikely to throw their investment away for something almost free and that is not that well known and may throw potential customers off. It is a selling point to potential customers rather than being the best of the best. Protools is used by many studios for the same reason 96000 sample rates are used.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |